boston hospital preferential treatment based on race

#BOSTON HOSPITAL PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE FREE#

The movement is destructive and will ultimately result in absolute chaos. A Boston hospital says it will offer preferential care based on race and race-explicit interventions in an attempt to engage in an antiracist agenda for medicine based on critical race theory.

It is here and the perpetual, self-flagellation of the liberal white clowns going along with this movement only serves to make it worse. If you are white, there is nothing that will satisfy the demands of this cult. This is the fruit of the anti-racist movement in America–pure and unadulterated racism. We encourage other institutions to proceed confidently on behalf of equity and racial justice, with backing provided by recent White House executive orders.

Offering preferential care based on race or ethnicity may elicit legal challenges from our system of colorblind law. But given the ample current evidence that our health, judicial, and other systems already unfairly preference people who are white, we believe-following the ethical framework of Zack and others-that our approach is corrective and therefore mandated. The FDA “fact sheet” for Sotrovimab, the only monoclonal antibody effective against the Omicron variant, states that “race or ethnicity” can “place individual patients at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19.” The fact sheet for Paxlovid, Pfizer’s new antiviral pill, uses the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s definition of “high risk,” which states that “systemic health and social inequities” have put minorities “at increased risk of getting sick and dying from COVID-19.Acknowledging that their actions are likely illegal, they advocate and encourage other institutions to implement the same kind of race-based preferential treatment as well:

#BOSTON HOSPITAL PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE FREE#

The FDA only authorized these treatments for “high risk” patients, and included race as a factor determining someone to be “high risk.” As the Free Beacon noted: According to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity. The racial discrimination stems from the FDA’s guidance when authorizing monoclonal antibodies and oral antivirals for emergency use. Doctors Say That 'Equity' Demands Inequality Amid a resurgence of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States and internationally, an explicitly racially-based health care program will be implemented later this spring at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, a globally known medical center in Boston. It must be stated from the outset that not only is such a racially-based program medically unethical, it is illegal. And in Minnesota, health officials have devised their own ‘ethical framework’ that prioritizes black 18-year-olds over white 64-year-olds-even though the latter are at much higher risk of severe disease,” the Free Beacon reported. In Utah, ‘Latinx ethnicity’ counts for more points than ‘congestive heart failure’ in a patient’s ‘COVID-19 risk score’-the state’s framework for allocating monoclonal antibodies. The proposed pilot initiative uses a reparations framework that focuses on Black and Latinx patients and community members and prioritizes their care.

“In New York, racial minorities are automatically eligible for scarce COVID-19 therapeutics, regardless of age or underlying conditions. A Boston hospital is set to offer preferential care to patients based on race. It’s not just New York prioritizing non-white residents for COVID-19 treatments, Utah and Minnesota are also doing it.Īs The Washington Free Beacon reported, the scheme didn’t start at state-level health departments, it began with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Boston hospital preferential treatment based on race